Embodied - emotive - enactive. poietic creativity.

Is it possible to have it all without referring to a meaningful and inspirational knowledge when we want to translate poietic creativity into visual reality? Embodying ART, that has nothing to do with emotive content seems to disagree with this concept, but it serves as an argument towards better understanding diversity in creativity and enactive aftermath. It is possible to enact beautiful and aesthetic creative work and embody it in emotive context to reach certain mode of communication, so important when ART and creative work aspire to engaging with the audience. Being aesthetic on one hand doesn't mean the ART and creative work will have to get equal its positive emotive status, and off course conceptual creative work or/and ART doesn't have to apply to its specific standards. When a circle is more conceptually than a tree, it can be as much emotive as the tree due to specifics in the visual art viewer's perception. So, we can never truly say:  why a tree with green leaves for so called standard viewer is less artistic and conceptual than a tree with green leaves? Maybe it is something to do with our mind frames and individual perception, or maybe it is something to do with IQ or EQ?

---

---

All content protected under copyright law. © 2015-2025 Karolina (Kala) Karmaza via (@kala_bennu) uk.linkedin.com/in/karolinakarmaza Navigate to the left hand side of the page for different levels of my creative potential - thank you :)